Property Misrepresentation Claims
Last reviewed: September 2026 · EA Personal Injury Solicitors
If you bought a property in reliance on a false or misleading statement made by the seller — often a dishonest or careless answer on the standard property information form — and this has caused you financial loss, you may be able to bring a misrepresentation claim. EA Personal Injury Solicitors can advise on your options.
TL;DR — Quick Summary
Key Points
- Most commonly arises from false answers on the standard TA6 Property Information Form
- A direct false statement can found a claim even where general "buyer beware" would otherwise apply
- You may also have a separate claim against a surveyor who missed the same defect
- Remedies can include damages, and in limited cases rescinding the purchase
- Six-year limitation period generally applies, longer where fraud is involved
What Is Property Misrepresentation?
A misrepresentation is a false statement of fact made by one party that induces another to enter into a contract. In the context of a property purchase, this typically arises from inaccurate or dishonest answers given by a seller on the standard conveyancing forms — most commonly the Law Society's Property Information Form (TA6) — or through other statements made directly or through the seller's estate agent or solicitor during the transaction.
"Buyer Beware" and Its Limits
English property law traditionally operates on the principle of caveat emptor — buyer beware — meaning a seller is generally not obliged to volunteer information about a property's condition, and a buyer is expected to satisfy themselves through survey and their own enquiries. This principle changes significantly, however, once the seller actually answers a specific question, whether on the standard forms or otherwise: a false or misleading answer to a direct question can found a claim, even in relation to a defect the general "buyer beware" principle might otherwise have left you to discover yourself.
Common Examples
- Disputes with neighbours — denying knowledge of an ongoing boundary dispute, noise complaint or other neighbour dispute
- Undisclosed defects — damp, subsidence, structural movement, Japanese knotweed or other significant issues the seller knew about but did not disclose when directly asked
- Planning and building regulations — false statements about whether extensions or alterations had the necessary permissions or sign-off
- Boundary and ownership issues — inaccurate statements about the extent of the property or shared access rights
- What is included in the sale — misrepresenting fixtures, fittings or rights included in the purchase
Establishing a Misrepresentation Claim
You will need to identify the specific false statement relied upon, show that it was untrue, that you relied on it in deciding to proceed with the purchase (or on the terms you did), and that this caused you a loss. The seriousness of the misrepresentation (innocent, negligent or fraudulent) affects the remedies available, with fraudulent misrepresentation carrying the widest range of remedies and longest effective time limit.
Evidence in Property Misrepresentation Claims
- The completed Property Information Form (TA6) and other pre-contract enquiries
- Your conveyancing file and correspondence
- Evidence of the defect or issue and when it began or was known about
- Expert evidence (surveyor, structural engineer or other specialist) on the nature, extent and cost of remedying the issue
- Evidence of your financial loss, such as repair quotations or a valuation assessing the property's true worth
Resolving Your Claim
We generally aim to resolve these disputes through negotiation with the seller (or their insurer, where relevant) in the first instance, turning to court proceedings only where a fair resolution cannot otherwise be reached.